The State of REITs: December 2023 Edition

18 out of 18 Property Types Yielded Positive Total Returns in November

100% percent of REIT property types averaged a positive total return in November. There was a sizeable 24.24% total return spread between the best and worst-performing property types. Advertising (+25.75%) and Office (15.80%) outperformed all other REIT property types in November.

Malls (+1.51%) and Shopping Centers (+2.89%) saw the smallest gains in November. Malls were dragged down by the dismal performance of Pennsylvania REIT (PRET) (-40.94%), which offset the strong outperformance of the other mall REITs: Macerich (+19.97%), Simon Property Group (SPG) (+13.65%) and CBL Properties (CBL) (+13.36%).

Performance of Individual Securities

Presidio Property Trust (SQFT) (+58.42%) was the best performing REIT in November, sharply rebounding after a rough first 10 months of the year. SQFT is now back in the black in 2023 with a +5.71% YTD total return.

Pennsylvania REIT (PRET) (-40.94%) plummeted after the release of Q3 earnings that revealed yet another brutal quarter, which signaled little chance of staving off a 2nd bankruptcy. PRET is now the 2nd worst performing REIT of 2023 (-78.81%), outperforming only the -97.28% trainwreck total return of Wheeler REIT (WHLR).

90.20% of REITs had a positive total return in November with only 42.50% in the black year to date. During the first 11 months of last year the average REIT had a -18.42% return. During the first 11 months of this year the average REIT has endured much smaller losses with a -2.27% average total return.

Only 13.04% of REITs had a positive total return in February with 76.4% in the black year to date. During the first two months of last year the average REIT had a -5.83% return, whereas this year the average REIT has seen a +4.93% total return.

.

Dividend Yield

Dividend yield is an important component of a REIT’s total return. The particularly high dividend yields of the REIT sector are, for many investors, the primary reason for investment in this sector. As many REITs are currently trading at share prices well below their NAV, yields are currently quite high for many REITs within the sector. Although a particularly high yield for a REIT may sometimes reflect a disproportionately high risk, there exist opportunities in some cases to capitalize on dividend yields that are sufficiently attractive to justify the underlying risks of the investment. I have included below a table ranking equity REITs from highest dividend yield (as of 11/30/2023) to lowest dividend yield.

REIT Premium/Discount to NAV by Property Type

Below is a downloadable data table, which ranks REITs within each property type from the largest discount to the largest premium to NAV. The consensus NAV used for this table is the average of analyst NAV estimates for each REIT. Both the NAV and the share price will change over time, so I will continue to include this table in upcoming issues of The State of REITs with updated consensus NAV estimates for each REIT for which such an estimate is available.

Takeaway

The large cap REIT premium (relative to small cap REITs) narrowed in November and investors are now paying on average about 30% more for each dollar of 2024 FFO/share to buy large cap REITs than small cap REITs (16.4x/12.6x – 1 = 30.2%). As can be seen in the table below, there is presently a strong positive correlation between market cap and FFO multiple.

In November the pace of bankruptcy filings decelerated from recent highs, but still marked the 14th straight month of year-over-year increases in filings. After the first 11 months of the year, 2023 has already surpassed the number of bankruptcy filings in any year since 2012, excluding 2020 which saw elevated filings during the government lockdowns. The Fed has signaled that there may be rate cuts coming in 2024, which could help to reduce the cost of capital for struggling businesses. However, the timing and magnitude of cuts is still uncertain, so bankruptcies may remain elevated over upcoming months.

Although a decline in share price can feel painful for shareholders in the short term, it can also present an accretive opportunity for REITs. When REITs trade materially below NAV, they have the opportunity to increase NAV by buying back shares at a discount. It is a common and effective practice by well-managed REITs to capitalize on pricing disparities by issuing new shares when trading at a premium to NAV and buying back shares when trading at a discount. Q3 2023 saw a year-over-year increase in share repurchase activity as REITs sought to take advantage of wide spreads between NAV and share price.

The property types that saw the greatest volume of share buybacks were Hotels, Self Storage, Diversified, Multifamily and Mall REITs. Advertising and Casino REITs engaged in minimal share repurchase activity.

National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA), JBG Smith Properties (JBGS), Simon Property Group (SPG) and Host Hotels & Resorts (HST) each repurchased over $100M of shares during Q3. JBGS and NSA bought back the largest portion of their outstanding shares with 7.5% and 7.1% of outstanding shares

3 REITs announced dividend hikes in November. Strawberry Fields REIT (STRW) had the largest increase of +9.1% followed by +3.1% for Regency Centers (REG) and +1.5% for Four Corners Property Trust (FCPT).

If projected Fed rate cuts play out in 2024, the dividend yields of many REITs could become increasingly attractive relative to declining treasury yields. With 114 REITs trading at a discount to NAV and 69 REITs having raised their dividend this year, the REIT sector remains well-positioned for further gains. However, the balance sheets and fundamentals of individual REITs range from very poor to stellar, so in order to successfully maximize total return in REIT investment it is essential to analyze the opportunity and risk that each specific REIT presents.

Important Notes and Disclosure

All articles are published and provided as an information source for investors capable of making their own investment decisions. None of the information offered should be construed to be advice or a recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction, or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The information offered is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person.

We cannot determine whether the content of any article or recommendation is appropriate for any specific person. Readers should contact their financial professional to discuss the suitability of any of the strategies or holdings before implementation in their portfolio. Research and information are provided for informational purposes only and are not intended for trading purposes. NEVER make an investment decision based solely on the information provided in our articles.

We may hold, purchase, or sell positions in securities mentioned in our articles and will not disclose this information to subscribers, nor the time the positions in the securities were acquired. We may liquidate shares in profiled companies at any time without notice. We may also take positions inconsistent with the information and views expressed on our website.

We routinely own and trade the same securities purchased or sold for advisory clients of 2MCAC. This circumstance is communicated to our clients on an ongoing basis. As fiduciaries, we prioritize our clients’ interests above those of our corporate and personal accounts to avoid conflict and adverse selection in trading these commonly held interests.

Past performance does not guarantee future results. Investing in publicly held securities is speculative and involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. Historical returns should not be used as the primary basis for investment decisions. Although the statements of fact and data in this report have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, 2MCAC does not guarantee their accuracy and assumes no liability or responsibility for any omissions/errors

Commentary may contain forward-looking statements that are by definition uncertain. Actual results may differ materially from our forecasts or estimations, and 2MCAC and its affiliates cannot be held liable for the use of and reliance upon the opinions, estimates, forecasts, and findings in this article.

Through October 2021, The State of REITs was published exclusively on Seeking Alpha by Simon Bowler, Sector Analyst at 2nd Market Capital Services Corporation (2MCSC).  Editions subsequent to October 2021 will be published on this website in addition to other platforms that may include Seeking Alpha.  2MCSC was formed in 1989 and provides investment research and consulting services to the financial services industry and the financial media. 2MCSC does not provide investment advice.  2MCSC is a separate entity but related under common ownership to 2nd Market Capital Advisory (2MCAC), a Wisconsin registered investment advisor.  Simon Bowler is an investment advisor representative of 2MCAC.  Any positive comments made by others should not be construed as an endorsement of the author's abilities to act as an investment advisor.

S&P disclosure:   S&P Global Market Intelligence LLC. Contains copyrighted material distributed under license from S&P.